In one of the contradictions of premier soccer this player is often pigeonholed as a striker and becomes the target of an unusually high percentage of passes from team mates. As a consequence he isn't expected to create his own opportunities or chances for others. This results in short-term recognition but undermines long-term development of the brave, creative and ethical leadership character so essential to a fulfilled life. Such individuals are more likely to develop a "peel me a grape" attitude. When the late maturer catches up and easy opportunities are no longer available this type of player often struggles. When the "go to player" is no longer producing the rest of the team also struggles because too much of their historical success relied on the genetic talents of one player. When one or two key players are injured the rest of the team is often unable to adjust because they were never taught or expected to be maximally self-sufficient.
For teams taught to rely on one or two key players such player losses would have been the end of the dream. We simply re-positioned our remaining brave, creative leaders to accommodate the losses and reached the Final Four!
Players (and their parents) who receive seemingly preferential treatment should carefully examine the long-term consequences of the "use what he's got to win now" approach. When individuals are constantly served the consequence is dis-empowerment. When individuals are taught to create their own opportunities the result is empowerment.
Which of these two opposites do we want our children to experience?
Beware the friendly imposter! He may rob your child of their future for his own ego.
No comments:
Post a Comment